Coercion, Corruption & Omission – Top 3 Takeaways – July 21st, 2023
- Coercion. Another day, another damning piece of evidence revealed in the Biden Crime Family chronicles. Yesterday the tale was one of coercion. It went a little like this. In a land far away, which is now at war with Russia, but in a time not all that long ago, there was a corrupt energy company which employed on its board of directors the crackhead son of our then Vice-President. And one fateful day the CEO, CFO and a CHS (which stands for confidential human source of the corrupt energy company) met with the former prime minister of Poland and the crackhead son of the Vice-President of the United States. And at this meeting what was discussed was the need for the corrupt energy company to be able to buy US assets which they’d been blocked from buying. As the story goes, the CHS was at a loss for what the role of the crackhead son of the Vice-President was...to which the CHS was told (he had) “Hired Hunter Biden to protect us, though his dad, from all kinds of problems”. But there was so much more to the various stories which were all told via a FD-1023 form which Senator Chuck Grassley disclosed. The four-page form added another wrinkle to a tale that’s long been known by those who are both honest and informed. It’s the tale of the fired Ukrainian prosecutor. But this one has a bit of a twist. Up to this point we’ve known that A) Hunter Biden miraculously went from being a crackhead to the board of a large and corrupt Ukrainian Energy company and was paid millions of dollars for doing it. B) That his dad, the Vice President, demanded the Ukrainian prosecutor, who was investigating the corrupt energy company, that his crackhead son worked at, be fired or the United States would withhold over $1 billion of foreign aid. But here’s the added wrinkle in the disclosure which is full of source information (some of which is redacted). The Bidens didn’t just carry out the firing of the prosecutor because they were regularly paying Hunter Biden for protection already.
- The Biden’s are said to have demanded even more than usual to carry out that act. This is directly from the FBI disclosure form: Shortly after the 2016 US election and during President Trump's transition period, CHS participated in a conference call with Ostapenko and Zlochevsky. CHS inquired whether Zlochevsky was happy with the US election results. Zlochevsky replied that he was not happy Trump won the election. CHS asked Zlochevsky whether he was concerned about Burisma's involvement with the Bidens. ZIochevsky stated he didn't want to pay the Bidens and he was "pushed to pay" them. (CHS explained the Russian term Zlochevsky used to explain the payments literally translates to "got it" or "received it", but Is also used in Russian-criminal-slang for being "forced or coerced to pay." ZJochevsky stated Shokin had already been fired, and no investigation was currently going on, and that nobody would find out about his financial dealings with the Bidens. CHS then stated, "l hope you have some back-up (proof) For your words (namely, that Zlochevsky was "forced" to pay the Bidens). Zlochevsky replied he has many text messages and "recordings" that show that he was coerced to make such payments. CHS told Zlochevsky he should make certain that he should retain those recordings. Zlochevsky asked whether it would make any (legal) difference whether he voluntarily made such payments, or if he was forced to make them. Zlochevsky then asked CHS whether CHS could provide any assistance in Ukraine (with the Poroshenko regime) if something were to happen to Zlochevsky in the future. CHS replied that CHS didn't want to get involved in any such matters. And here’s the kicker. This disclosure came from an FBI whistleblower. The FBI has been aware of this for years. The details of the Biden coercion story were provided to the FBI on June 29th of 2020. Now, some of this has been discussed. Some of this has been alleged. Now we have the hard disclosure evidence which ties together Hunter’s “business dealings” with the income he chose not to report to the IRS, for rather obvious reasons beyond tax evasion, and that the FBI indeed has covered this all up right along. Now, some will still allege that these sources and these records could be lying. But then ask yourself, how else did Hunter get those jobs? How did Hunter retain those jobs for years? How did Hunter get paid a minimum of $10 million? It’s a tale as old as time and it makes me deeply concerned for our country that Democrats nor their allies in news media seem to care that the President of the United States literally sold our country out and the Federal Bureau of Investigation is complicit. But hey how about those Trump charges? Right? Yeah – bad Orangeman. Be sure to get that guy. For a long time, defenders of the Biden’s have said one thing. Where’s the proof? Well, that form is likely your proof. No, not everything in that now disclosed form is corroborated. But the question is, if you don’t believe it’s true – you still must answer how Hunter got those jobs, why he was paid out millions for years and how FBI and IRS whistleblowers all have independently produced evidence which corroborates. On that note...
- Do you think the US Department of Justice is motivated by partisan politics? That was a national poll question posed by Sinclair Media and with over 7,500 respondents the answer was overwhelmingly yes. 80% of those responding said they believe the US Department of Justice is motivated by politics which is interesting in addition to encouraging. It’s a sign that most people, regardless of political persuasion, at least have their eyes open enough to see that our Justice Department isn’t operating on the level. But what it seemingly indicates is the extent to which people are uninformed about the Biden Crime Family festivities. To that end, a quick search at the time of this poll yesterday showed NBC News with this top headline: Trump grand jury to hear testimony from aide who was with him on Jan. 6. The top ABC News headline: Jan. 6 Grand Jury Convenes. Top CBS News headline: Trump adds new attorney to legal team for 2020 election probe. CNN’s top headline: Florida’s new standard for teaching Black history sparks outrage. Really? But hey at least they deviated from Trump. And what I didn’t see on any of those website homepages...anything to do with the whistleblowers or anything to do with the just dropped hard evidence of Biden corruption and Justice Department collusion. Far more Americans appear as though they would be outraged by what’s happened with the Bidens and the coverups – if they only knew about them. I’ve always said the most pervasive form of bias in news media is omission. This is the latest example. I’ll continue to do my part to try to inform as many people as possible. There are two sides to stories and one side to facts.